Human Sacrifice

This is a highly speculative blog post, I’m not claiming any of this is ‘right’ but it may be a productive way of reimagining a more uncomfortable aspect of human history.

I’ve been watching ‘Planet Earth’ recently – as a box set arrived over the festive period. I’ve seen great herds of wildebeest crossing rivers and being eaten by crocodiles. I’ve seen vast flocks of bats, and the snakes who wait at the mouths of their caves. Seals being eaten by sharks. Pretty much every creature that gathers in large groups to travel or feed, seems to get these predators. The large numbers improve the odds of survival for any given individual, but also attract the hunters.

We are a soft and squishy species. Our hides, teeth and claws really aren’t up to much. Tool use, developing into weapons of both hunting and defence, have changed the game for us considerably. Once upon a time, we must have been wandering ready-meals. No doubt we faced all the same issues as the wildebeest and seals. We’re also smart, we have a knack for thinking about cause and effect, a habit of seeing patterns, that will show us patterns where none exist sometimes.

Imagine if the wildebeest figured out that by deliberately giving someone to the crocodiles, the majority would pass safely. Nature takes its tolls and tithes, and more often than not, these are fairly predictable in terms of timing and location. Whether they wanted to or not, our human ancestors were losing people to the wilderness. Storms and floods kill, so do famines. It’s not a great leap of logic to go from pacifying the crocodiles in a very literal way, to trying the same trick with the sea.

Oddly enough, I suspect giving human sacrifices to other dangerous things may have worked to a degree for wholly pragmatic reasons. Every time you do it, you pass on a degree of knowledge that you are dealing with something dangerous here, something that will have its tribute in blood. Every time you do that deliberately, you remind everyone else not to get complacent about the river, even if it hasn’t killed anyone in ages. You enact the dangerousness, you reinforce the need for respect. You quite possibly do reduce the chances of other people dying there.

The world was a much more dangerous place for our ancient ancestors. It strikes me as possible that the practise of human sacrifice would have started out as a much more pragmatic activity, much more immediately connected to life as experienced. It’s only later, when you get away from the immediate needs and start to build institutions around the process, that you might develop something innately sinister. As a species we don’t really know when to stop. We find something that works, and default to the assumption that scaling it up, doing it more often and in a more organised way will be even better. We have an innate assumption that more is better.

In just the same way we’ve gone from useful bartering tokens to money systems that people kill for, and that bring about numerous deaths around the globe every year. We needlessly kill and maim vast numbers of people on the roads each year, for the sake of going further and faster. We are still practicing human sacrifice on a large scale. We’ve just labelled it differently so that we can uphold our illusion of being more civilised now.

About Nimue Brown

Druid, author, dreamer, folk enthusiast, parent, polyamourous animist, ant-fash, anti-capitalist, bisexual steampunk. Drinker of coffee, maker of puddings. Exploring life as a Pagan, seeking good and meaningful ways to be, struggling with mental health issues and worried about many things. View all posts by Nimue Brown

9 responses to “Human Sacrifice

  • angharadlois

    An imaginative and resonant take – your last point is particularly important, I think, and I would love to see it explored even further.

  • Christopher Blackwell

    Back around World War I an wealthy American was visiting England and the Stone Henge. Someone at the time told him that it had been a place of human sacrifice.

    The wealthy American replied, “We still sacrifice our best and bravest young men to the Gods of War.”

    He later went back and built a concrete replica of the Stone Henge as a anti-war protest. Later names of war dead were engraved on it . It is properly aligned and I have done an equinox ceremony at this replica near Marymount , Washington State, in the United States.

    On the matter of Human Sacrifice, Arch Druid Isaac Bonewits said something to the effect of, “Even if we could prove historically that Druids did do human sacrifice in ancient times, we would not likely do it, for it is messy and it would disturb the neighbors.”

    • Nimue Brown

      Beautifully put, and what a powerful thing to do! History was a much bloodier place on all fronts and I wonder if in part sacrifice is what you get when, as a community you cannot afford to lock up and then feed, and deploy human resources guarding, people who are too dangerous to have wandering around unsupervised.

  • templewilderness

    Yeah Bonewits did a good job of neutering and trimming the claws and fangs of Pre christian european heathen rites.Just like the whole crowd of Llewellyn authors who castrated it to make a buck off lapsing Christians.

    • Nimue Brown

      I’m not in favour of sanitizing the ancestors, the Druids, the Christians or any others. They were a bloody and often troubling lot, and it is important to recognise how different life has been across time. The ‘it would be messy and disturb the neighbours’ bit I very much agree with, but I think we can certainly assume the ancient Druids did it, at least occasionally, because most ancient peoples did in times of crisis, with prisoners of war who could not be integrated in other ways, and with criminals. The Romans called it sport instead, but I see little difference between the gladiatorial arena and any other kind of ritual death.

  • literaryvittles

    fascinating take on it… I have certainly never thought of human sacrifice as justified in any way before! This may have to do with the fact that “The Lottery” by Henry Fielding was required reading in my high school.

    • Nimue Brown

      I’ve not read that! I think for me it comes from realising that a lot of dysfunctional modern activity, especially at the personal level, is seldom that irrational. The logic may be flawed or out of date, but we tend to have reasons that we consider good, and it makes me think the apparently less rational things of the past may also have ways of looking at them which cause them to make more sense.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: