Misleading tales of progress

It’s common, especially in political narratives, to tell tales of progress. At the moment, increased material wealth and increased GDP are the focal points for such stories. More stuff and more cash means we are better off, and better off is by definition, a good thing. However, if we told the story of bodily fitness, mental health or happiness, the picture might look a bit more complicated. If we tell the story of our environment it becomes a tale of abuse and degradation, not gain.

The stories we tell as communities shape who we think we are, where we think we’re going and how we feel about that. This is one of the reasons politicians favour progress narratives, because these affirm them as successful leaders. It’s also a big problem for Greens because we’re looking at the environmental picture and wanting to frame ‘progress’ as sustainability and long term viability. To do that we need everyone to consume less, which according to the dominant narrative, means we want the exact opposite of progress which would be A Bad Thing because we’ve all agreed that progress is A Good Thing.

Poverty causes suffering. Our current era is not short of financial poverty, there’s a shocking amount of it internationally. People who cannot afford to eat and live, rather than the ‘ciabatta line’. In the narrative of economic progress, somehow this is acceptable collateral damage. I think there’s a kind of economic Darwinism at play that says ‘survival of the richest’ and assumes those who cannot accumulate wealth do not deserve to survive. Never mind that the accumulation of wealth is so inextricably linked to the existence of poverty. Our narrative of progress seems to be telling people that it is ok to exploit others for personal gain and then deny all responsibility for their suffering.

In practice there is no grand thrust forward, no heroic stride into the better and brighter future. Some things get better for some, and worse for others. We might think of cars as progress, but we also need to consider the numbers of people and creatures killed and injured by them every year, and the damage of air pollution. The internet may be technological progress, but socially it may be a disaster as we raise the ‘look down’ generation who do not go out much.

Progress narratives are alluring. We want to feel like we’re winning and getting better and that the future will be even better and this makes us exceedingly vulnerable to anyone who has a progress narrative to sell us. We don’t want to be anxious or uneasy or feel like we’re in trouble, and this inclines us to be collectively deaf to those who point out the problems. They’re scaremongering, we feel. It won’t be that bad. The politician who can make us believe it’s all going to be fine tends to get our votes. We want business as usual and the glorious march of progress and even when the things we can see with our own eyes don’t square with the story, we cling to the story all too often.

If we took more interest in the outcomes, we might be more willing to suffer some short term discomforts for the sake of getting things right. Ultimately, our current progress narrative is going to deliver us the exact opposite of progress – climate change and international crisis. We need some new stories.

About Nimue Brown

Druid, author, dreamer, folk enthusiast, parent, polyamourous animist, ant-fash, anti-capitalist, bisexual steampunk. Drinker of coffee, maker of puddings. Exploring life as a Pagan, seeking good and meaningful ways to be, struggling with mental health issues and worried about many things. View all posts by Nimue Brown

8 responses to “Misleading tales of progress

  • angharadlois

    One interesting story to tell about this kind of “progress” – as you picked up on in your post – is about sacrifice. This country doesn’t practice human sacrifice any more, does it? Or doesn’t it? Think of the number of people killed by cars every year: this, we have decided, is an acceptable human sacrifice to make to the god we call “the right to drive.” I like this one, because it turns the old “ancient druids performed human sacrifice” story on its head, and also brings home the human cost of the way we have collectively decided to live.

  • siobhanwaters

    Reblogged this on adayinthelifeofawitch and commented:
    This is a great post. angharadlois also raises a good point in the comments.

  • landisvance

    Reblogged this on Spirit Mountain Wilds and commented:
    This is a bit off topic for me, except that my love for wilderness requires care of it. Nimue Brown offers a way inside the current argument that resonates powerfully with me. We must change the stories we tell.

  • PatG

    Unchecked progress is called cancer. Lee Ann and I have come to a place where we focus on having enough rather than having more. Life is much less stressful that way.

  • Christopher Blackwell

    Having more money might be progress if you still paid the same prices but not at all if the prices advance either at the sea speed or faster. What my parents paid for a new home on a 50 by 100 foot lot with a garage and a two bedroom house with lath ad plaster and oak floors, when I was three years old, became what it cost me to buy a used twenty foot camping trailer [Caravan] the years ago, and today perhaps a junk car. I do not feel wealthy when I fid a large sack of groceries cost me $52 when I was buying less than normal and I do not buy meat, eggs or bread any more.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: