Whose universe is it?

In the last week or so, a collision of two books has got me thinking about the nature of reality and how we relate to it. (Jack Barrow’s The Hidden Masters and the Unspeakable Evil was one of them). For the magician, the self is the centre of the universe, and the will / imagination can direct said. I’m a long way from being an expert, but as I understand it, holding that belief is rather necessary if you want to go about doing magic. Now, on the Zen side, Jo points out there is one universe and we’re not the centre of it and if we can learn to see ourselves as part of the flow we’ll be able to get along a lot better.

I find both ideas compelling, and after some serious pondering I have come to the conclusion that these things are probably both true. One universe where you are not the centre, another where each of us the centre of his or her own universe and able to shape it by force of will. The life we live, the way we experience things, the choices we make – come down so often to our perceptions and beliefs. If I believe the universe is out to get me, I’ll see proof of that in every setback, and will resolutely ignore the opportunities that came with the setbacks, potentially to my own detriment. If I believe that I am divinely inspired with a special job to do, I’ll look around me and see proof of that in every rainbow and cupcake that comes my way. We see what we want to see.

What’s probably least helpful is bumbling through life without any deliberate choice about how to engage with the world. I don’t mean a ‘go with the flow’ attitude here, I mean a total lack of engagement with anything. The kind of blinkered view that makes it impossible to connect outcomes to actions, to predict how what we do today might shape our options for tomorrow, and to be able to see how other people’s motives might affect things. I’ve encountered that kind of wilful blindness, that refusal to see how what we do influences what we get, often coupled with an inability to imagine that other people are different from us, want different things and react in different ways.

I’m not sure it entirely matters what your relationship with the universe is. I am utterly convinced of the importance of having a considered approach to living and being. Even if that doesn’t fit into an existing idea about how to do things. But then, I’ve also seen so many human relationships conducted with no consciousness of cause and effect, or the implications of difference, too. Things work better when we pay attention to them, think about them, and do not take them for granted.

I am the centre of my own little universe. I am also aware that everyone around me is the centre of their own little universe too, no one of these any more important than any other, all of them able to influence how my bit of reality functions for me, all of them potentially influenced by what I do. Perhaps it could be a lot simpler than that, but I find this perspective works enough for me, so it’ll do for now.

About Nimue Brown

Druid, author, dreamer, folk enthusiast, parent, polyamourous animist, ant-fash, anti-capitalist, bisexual steampunk. Drinker of coffee, maker of puddings. Exploring life as a Pagan, seeking good and meaningful ways to be, struggling with mental health issues and worried about many things. View all posts by Nimue Brown

5 responses to “Whose universe is it?

  • lornasmithers

    I’d agree with your view on the multiplicity of centres, all connected. I was always keen on Leibniz’ monadology and the idea that every individual contains traces of the whole universe within itself. Admittedly, it’s been a long time since I engaged in any philosophy.

  • Jack Barrow

    Yes indeed. My macrocosm is your microcosm, or al least a bit of it is. (Perhaps that’s the root of conflict when the two don’t mirror sufficiently.) Interestingly levels of reality is one of the themes for the sequel for the Hidden Masters and the Unspeakable Evil which has been so long coming that I’m afraid I’ve forgotten may of the ideas that I’ve planned to include. Just like Lorna it’s been a long time since I worked with ideas such as this and I really miss it.

  • Kaylee

    You’re very right that we see only want we want to see, we hear only ehat we eant to hear. Reminds me of Harry Nilson’s “The Point”. How we want to see things is often how we see them.
    Also, the two perspectives of those books are not mutually exclusive. One of the things you get taught in physics is that it’s all relative to your frame of reference. You could derive equations that will calculate the movements of everything centered on yourself. Or, you could use any of a near infinite amount of points of reference. Which is correct? In physics, the one with the easiest math. Different centers can be useful in different situations. That same point that was useful ten minutes ago may no longer be as helpful now.

  • Raven Seven

    This is so true Nimue. Shame many people can’t see that perhaps their desire to dominate is not welcome. They get offended when I air my point of view in response to their domination.

  • helgaleena

    My related recent reading it Entangled Minds by Dean Radin, a physicist with the Institute of Noetic Sciences…

    It seems that quantum physics has rendered our reality permeable enough to justify all sorts of magical interpretations, and your reality is very you-determined. Have a scone. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: