If Druidry ruled the world

While the likelihood of us ever again having a culture that is governed by Druid principles is small, I think it’s still worth considering what that would look like. Would it even be viable to have a culture where Druid ideas underpin government, law and so forth? I think one of the measures of any idea’s usefulness is whether it would work to have everyone adopt it, or what the consequences of universal uptake would be. Foolish things which cause no problem in the hands of a few lone idiots can turn into nightmares if they get a widespread hold. We could compare atheism and fascism on this score, the first has contributed to improving the human condition, the second becomes murderous once it has power. What would Druidry become, if universal?

The next question is, whose Druidry are we talking about here? My brand of liberal, inclusive, non-dogmatic Druidry, or something more controlling? Something more about titles and people who want to feel important? I think as soon as Druidry becomes dictatorial and authoritative, it’s no different from any other kind of self serving tyranny. If Druidry was universal, it would acquire all of the self serving tyrants, and I am not confident that all of them would become liberal, benevolent Druids. What this mostly suggests to me is that it probably isn’t in our interests, or the interests of Druidry, to have Druidry be universal. I can’t help but feel the anti-materialist, liberal healer and pacifist from the desert wouldn’t be at all happy about the wars and oppression rich men have undertaken in his name. I have no desire to see that happen to us.

One of the things Druidry has in common with other faiths, is the aspect that, if everyone took it up and practiced it with integrity, we wouldn’t need much in terms of systems and mediations. The reality tends to be, in any religious climate, that most people do not go deeply into spiritual practice. There are plenty of people in the UK who call themselves Christian but only turn up for rites of passage and show no discernible Christian influences in their daily life. Plenty of people who call themselves pagan are no different, wanting to learn a bit of magic, acquire a bit of glamour, turn up in their best cloaks for the odd ritual, but not really change their lives. So far, history suggests that this is what the majority do with all religions – surface, recreation, power base, ego boost, social engagement; the non-spiritual aspects of religion tend to dominate, while the majority resent being expected to put any ideas into practice.

It is, for example, one of my most certain beliefs that a person following a spiritual path should begin by putting aside their television. TVs take too much time and energy from us, and feed us wrong ideas, wrong beliefs, wrong desires. Every time I say this there are squeals of protest from people who have so many reasons why their television is good, helpful, contributing and needed. They like it, they want it, need it, consider that it benefits them. I can call it spiritual poison until I’m blue in the face, it will make no odds. Except with those who have come to the same conclusions for the same reasons and made the jump already.

A society run on superficially druid principles would, I anticipate, be hardly any different from what we’ve got. We’d change the language a bit, we’d drape beards and robes over a few things, dangle some conceptual mistletoe and get back to business as usual. Superficial religion only has the power to change surfaces. Again, look at the kind of right wing ‘Christian’ business in America, and what you’ll see is the demand and aggression of greed, trying to use God for its own ends, wearing a mask of belief behind which behaviours utterly at odds with the essence of the faith, continue unchecked. At least being a minority faith, we don’t have to watch Druidry being perverted in the same way.

If everyone followed a spiritual path deeply, the differences in what we practice would not be that important. The heart of every major faith involves peace and harmony. The essence of every deeply observed spiritual path, is spirituality. Along with that, are versions of virtue. While understandings of virtue vary between faiths, acting with responsibility and compassion are frequent themes. In a world in which everybody made it their job, in all their waking hours, to undertake everything they did with care and respect, with compassion and honour, we wouldn’t need any systems. We would not need the police, judges, courts of law. We might need people to help facilitate mediation and figure out best solutions, but that would be it. Government would only exist as a way of facilitating bigger projects and things we couldn’t manage at a more local and personal level. We would not need much in the way of laws, we would tackle each situation as it came, seeking the best for everyone and able to trust that everyone else was also committed to finding the best for everyone. Sounds like a fairy tale, doesn’t it? But the reason we don’t have that, is because most of us, as individuals, have chosen not to do it. And when you stop to think about it, that’s pretty shocking.

About Nimue Brown

Druid, author, dreamer, folk enthusiast, parent, wife to the most amazing artist -Tom Brown. Drinker of coffee, maker of puddings. Exploring life as a Pagan, seeking good and meaningful ways to be, struggling with mental health issues and worried about many things. View all posts by Nimue Brown

7 responses to “If Druidry ruled the world

  • ancientlonging42b1

    Hi Nina,

    So true, people leave responsibilty to others & then moan & gripe that the world is not a fair & just place. Responsibilty for the world at large rests with every one of us as individual & when more people cotton on to this things can change.

    I subscribe to your blog & read your posts everyday Nina. I look forward to then as a moment to pause & a voice of sanity in this very fast & greedy world.
    Thank you
    Patrick aka @mcthemac

  • Jonathan

    Wonderful article. I couldn’t agree more with its conclusions – the issue is not whether or not people are Druids (or Christians, or Jews, or Hindus, or Jains) but that they approach their spirituality in the right manner. Personally, I feel there is something to be learned from the Indian model of spiritual pluralism – a wide range of different traditions, all embedded in a broader social fabric that is informed by all of them, but not ruled by any.

  • Alex Jones

    I could say a lot on this subject, but I will be brief.

    1. Neo-Druidism and Ancient-Druidism are totally different. Neo-Druidism is a subjective individualistic outlook. Ancient-Druidism is a community outlook that covered all aspects of society.

    2. There is a need in my opinion for a philosopher class working alongside administrators in modern government.

    3. There exists Druid laws known as the Brehon Laws of Ireland, and the laws of Hwyel Dda in Wales.

    4. Druids could also be described as the intellectual class: thus all judges, teachers, lawyers, engineers, priests, philosophers, bards, doctors, historians and scientists were a member of them.

    5. Druidism evolved from Shamanism, and still retained its outlook. They are a perfect middle way between nomadic hunter-gatherer society and civilisation, and could offer a middle way to those cultures struggling to cross the vast void between the two outlooks, for instance Native American Indians.

    6. Druidism reflected society as a whole, in fact they were the foundation stones of society.

    7. A big difference between religion and spiritual, as comparable as normally practiced Islam is to Sufi Islam.

  • Angharad

    Some very good points, well made.
    I would not want to see a druid theocracy any more than I would want to see any other religion ruling the world. There is much that druidry has to offer, though, and I love following this blog (and many others) to see how people really live their druidry and its values in their day-to-day lives.

    While I don’t own a television (and I have no plans to – I know how tempting it can be to simply flick the switch and lose an evening), I enjoy TV programmes much the same as I enjoy novels, and I would not regard them as spiritual poison. I think I understand your reason for arguing that we should give them up; Marx would have called it false consciousness, but it is present in every aspect of our media, not just in the television. TV seems worse, I think, because it absorbs two of our senses, sight and sound, making it harder to shake off its influence once we are caught up in watching something.

    Also… in response to Alex Jones: Hywel Dda’s laws cannot really be understood as druidic, since he identified himself as a Christian (Catholic) king.

    • Nimue Brown

      The poison is less the programs (some are better than others) than the constant adverts, the pressure to buy, to consume, and the notion of what we ‘need’ that is sold to us through the screen. That, I think, is tremendously harmful. TV in moderation is fair enough, but so many people struggle to turn it off…

  • celticchick

    This post speaks to me on so many levels. I’m am so angry at the way the Republican party here in American is leaning too far to the right. I’m an Independent and I have voted for Democrats and Republicans, but I will say that right now the way things stand, with the way they are taking away rights from women especially, and trying to send us back to the 13th century, I won’t be voting for any Republicans any time soon.
    I also want to add that any ruling board can be a bad thing if they get power hungry, and I suppose Druids could be power hungry. They had say over the Celtic kings and they could have had some bad ideas just like anyone. Too much power in any hands can be dangerous.
    I think it’s the bane of humans that we can’t just have common sense. Because we are too stupid to do the right things, we have to have Government. We brought this on ourselves.
    Great post, Bryn.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: